Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:29:25 +0100
Message-id: <200603091829.25469.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
In-reply-to: <1792750.QOuatjSz9X@tao.metrics.net>
References: <20060307095358.GA20724@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603082219130.3583@bobcat> <1792750.QOuatjSz9X@tao.metrics.net>

On Thursday 09 March 2006 18:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Jurij Smakov wrote:
> While I have not thoroughly tested 2.6.15 in this respect, in 2.6.8 and
> 2.6.12 some IDE drivers, on some hardware, absolutely does[0]. Maybe
> this is fixed in 2.6.15/16.

I've forwarded this message to 345067@bugs.debian.org (tech-ctte)

Attachment: pgpSjLs45Hx95.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Escalating #345067 to the technical comittee, as the maintainer asked me to do so, and is unable or unwilling to do his job without this.
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
  - From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
- Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <aderobertis@metrics.net>

Prev by Date: Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
Next by Date: Fixed in upload of linux-2.6 2.6.15+2.6.16-rc5-0experimental.1 to experimental
Previous by thread: Re: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
Next by thread: jonas, you are being dishonest.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread