Bug#404626: linux-image-2.6.18-3-486: logitech quickcam not detected by ati rage r128 all-in- wonder-tvout-card
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-486
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: important
Dear Sir,
The quickcam messenger logitech cannot be detected by the kernel of linux if it is with a
video card of type : ati all-in-wonder rage 128 tvin / tvout bulk. The corresponding webcam
is shown there : http://patrick295767.sitesled.com/debian-bug-report/logitech-webcam-quickcam-messenger.jpg
The webcam has been tried on several linux image version above 2.6 (ubuntu dapper &
edgy)
and is fully working on computer having nvidia video card and s3 video cards...
For ati all in wonder video card, the problem can be caused by the fact that both ati
tvout/tvin and webcam are not detected by
the kernel. No additioanl /dev/video are created and seen for the logitech webcam and ati.
I recently bought an additional tv-card tuner and the /dev/video0 has been created. I can
watch tv via the newly bought tv-card tuner of type pinnacle and pci.
Hence, on the computer, /dev/video0 /dev/video1 /dev/video2 at least should be seen and
recognized. Only the /dev/video0 corresponding to the tv tuner card pinnacle can be
accessible.
I tried anything that can be adviced on forums and persons around since more than 6-8
months, even more.
I would be very welcoming if you could fix the linux kernel issue.
Thank you very much,
Yours sincerely,
Patrick
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-3-486 depends on:
ii coreutils 5.97-5 The GNU core utilities
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.85e tools for generating an initramfs
ii module-init-tools 3.3-pre3-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
linux-image-2.6.18-3-486 recommends no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
Reply to: