[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#388350: marked as done (Add USB eject patch from Ubuntu)



Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:44:43 -0700
with message-id <[🔎] 20061213164443.GA9041@colo>
and subject line Bug#388350: Ipod eject
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package:  Nautilus
Version:  2.14.3-1

Nautilus fails to properly unmount my ipod saying - unable to eject
media, eject unable to open '/dev/sda2'.

I'm curious if Ubuntu may have a patch for this, as I know my ipod is
able to unmount properly in Ubuntu.  

I am running Debian GNU/Linux Sid, kernel 2.6.17-2-686, and libc6
2.3.6.ds1-4  

Cheers



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.18-1

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:47:39PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > Nautilus fails to properly unmount my ipod saying - unable to eject
> > media, eject unable to open '/dev/sda2'.
> > 
> > I'm curious if Ubuntu may have a patch for this, as I know my ipod is
> > able to unmount properly in Ubuntu.  
> > 
> > I am running Debian GNU/Linux Sid, kernel 2.6.17-2-686, and libc6
> > 2.3.6.ds1-4  
> 
> (This bug was reassign from Nautilus to linux-2.6 as I believe this 
> to be a kernel issue)
> 
> I don't have a problem getting my iPodling to eject cleanly using 
> linux-image-2.6.18-2-686 version 2.6.18-5. No more error messages, and 
> the iPod itself display the "OK to disconnect" on the display.
> 
> Can anyone else confirm before I close this bug?

2.6.18 is in etch, so closing

-- 
dann frazier


--- End Message ---

Reply to: