Your message dated Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:52:13 +0100 with message-id <200612021052.22352.debian@layer-acht.org> and subject line g5 imacs now silent? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: Please build windfarm_pm81 in the kernel, not as a module.
- From: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:38:44 +0900
- Message-id: <20061110153844.2767.20567.reportbug@sorbet.igloo>
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64 Version: 2.6.18-5 Severity: important Dear Kernel team, The code controlling fan speed on iMac G5 do not work correctly as a module. As a consequence, the fans run full speed with the standard kernel in Debian. This renders the mac unusable: the fans are _very_ loud when they are fullspeed. The only solution I know is to build windfarm_pm81 directly in the kernel. This is only doable for experienced users. I hope that you can manage to bring a corrected kernel in Etch, otherwise I am affraid that nobody except developpers will use Debian on iMacs G5. Lastly, is is not impossible that all of this extends to the other windfarm modules (91 and 112). Have a nice day, Charles Plessy, Wako, Saitama, Japan. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16farm Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-18 Yet Another mkInitRD linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/initrd-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: false linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: false linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: linux-image-2.6.18-2-powerpc64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.18-2-powerpc64: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, 397942-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: g5 imacs now silent?
- From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:52:13 +0100
- Message-id: <200612021052.22352.debian@layer-acht.org>
- In-reply-to: <20061130170636.GD17788@powerlinux.fr>
- References: <200611301624.08597.debian@layer-acht.org> <20061130170636.GD17788@powerlinux.fr>
Hi, On Thursday 30 November 2006 18:06, Sven Luther wrote: [#397942] > > If this is correct, this bug can be closed. Is it correct? > The bug should be retitled and reassigned to initramfs-tools, if it is not > already. It only makes sense to do this, if its confirmed, that initramfs-tools doesn't make sure the modules are loaded. I lack this confirmation atm. Can someone confirm (or deny) that on a newly installed sid system, these modules are not loaded? If so, I'm happy to open a bug against initramfs-tools, but I close this bug now, because the history of it is not interesting to read for the initramfs-tools maintainer anyway :) > Holger: thanks for the work you are doing. Can you also comment on : > #397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid > flag to partitions. > Maybe it would be worth to raise the severity of this bug, but i can hardly > do this, or i will be seen as whiner who ups the severity of his pet bugs, > can i ask you to have a look at them ? I think the severity is right, if it's not a bit too high already :) RAID is not working, that's bad, but not the end of the world. So certainly not higher than important (which it is), maybe it's even normal. I'll leave it as it is. regards, Holger -- quoting http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.de.html#codeofconduct "When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:... When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied." We live in the year 2006, a few bytes wasted in the footer of a mail don't hurt anymore, but everybody is flooded with information and attention is a spare ressource. If you send a mail cc: to a list and to me, it will catch my attention even if I have none. Please don't. Unless you specifically want to catch my attention of course :) But If I don't say otherwise, I'm subscribed to the mailinglist (and this is true for non-Debian lists as well) and you don't need to cc: me. Thanks.Attachment: pgpNKkQSeQNNg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---