Re: suspend2-patch in forthcoming Etch?
- To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: suspend2-patch in forthcoming Etch?
- From: Andre Massing <massing@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:24:11 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4570653B.3080900@gmx.de>
- In-reply-to: <20061130155818.GE30153@baikonur.stro.at>
- References: <456CA742.4090104@gmx.de> <20061128221107.GA30153@baikonur.stro.at> <456EF523.9030106@gmx.de> <20061130155818.GE30153@baikonur.stro.at>
Hi again,
maximilian attems wrote:
>>>
>> What does this exactly mean? Must Nigel submit it to upstream? AFAIK (at
>
> yes, debian does not include third party patches
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
> Xen und Vserver are evident "enterprise ready" exceptions ;)
Okay, I don't wanna keep whining about some missing patches ;-) , but
according to your reference I ask myself (and of course you :-) ) why for
example are there patches like linux-patch-bootsplash or
kernel-patch-debianlogo included, which obviously don't fit to the
requirements of the debian kernel team.
Going back to work now...
Cheers,
Andre
Reply to: