[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Really 2.6.18?



On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:33:39AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> But Maks, how we'll ensure that there's no regressions for our users?
> 
> Or the idea is to suply two installation medias? One with released
> kernel and other with the "new" kernel? That would be great but would
> push a lot of more work on d-i team.

Probably one media with both kernel options (like sarge 2.4/2.6 today).
2.6.18 would be the default to avoid regressions.

-- 
dann frazier



Reply to: