Bug#390541: .17-.19-rc1 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, .16 works fine
On Sun, Oct 15 2006, Georg Wittenburg wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 09:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10 2006, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > Jens, please, help to sort out this one. 2.6.19-rc1 was tested with no
> > > luck.
> > >
> > > Bug's thread with more logs is here:
> > > <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel/22903>
> > As nobody seems to have a clue about this so far, I'd suggest you start
> > git bisecting with 2.6.16 as the good kernel and 2.6.17 as the bad
> > kernel to try and narrow the breakage point down a bit.
> I was about to give this a try, starting with 2.6.17-rc1. Unfortunately, I'm
> already running into trouble because 2.6.17-rc1 doesn't compile cleanly with
> Debian's .config neither from 2.6.16 nor 2.6.17. The error I'm getting is:
> CC security/selinux/xfrm.o
> security/selinux/xfrm.c: In function 'selinux_socket_getpeer_dgram':
> security/selinux/xfrm.c:284: error: 'struct sec_path' has no member named 'x'
> security/selinux/xfrm.c: In function 'selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb':
> security/selinux/xfrm.c:317: error: 'struct sec_path' has no member named 'x'
> make: *** [security/selinux/xfrm.o] Error 1
> make: *** [security/selinux] Error 2
> make: *** [security] Error 2
> Am I right in assuming that the correct way to work around this is to disable
> the related config options? Is this part of the normal git bisecting
> procedure or should I be using different .config files alltogether?
> If you could point me to the correct source files of the driver (maybe in
> drivers/ide/), I wouldn't mind trying a less brute-force approach.
You probably just want to disable selinux and continue...