Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Cc: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, kyle@debian.org, nobse@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:08:34 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20061013060834.GG2926@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, kyle@debian.org, nobse@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 17710.49090.351034.560449@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
- References: <[🔎] 20061010115358.GD12664@mail.lowpingbastards.de> <[🔎] 20061012104100.GA14735@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 20061012115853.GC2926@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20061012150245.GA21030@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] 17710.49090.351034.560449@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
* Matthias Klose (doko@cs.tu-berlin.de) [061013 06:43]:
> Even if the kernel cannot be built with 4.1, it would be nice to have
> bug reports. I'm not aware of any alpha related reports, although it's
> not my pet arch.
Of course.
> I'm still planning not to build g++-4.0 from the 4.0 sources, now that
> all packages are built using 4.1 or using 3.4 as a fallback. We'll
> need the 4.0 source anyway to build libgcc2 on hppa and glibc on the
> hurd.
Good. That means that switching alpha to 4.1 would "just" be nice
anyways.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: