Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

To: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>, 387498@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, control@bugs.debian.org, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, debian-mips@bugs.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:38:50 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061012193846.GA16097@bode.aurel32.net>
In-reply-to: <20061009060258.GA20824@bode.aurel32.net>
References: <20060930130332.GH30190@einval.com> <20060930155656.GA30302@networkno.de> <541wpqn3tc.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <20061009060258.GA20824@bode.aurel32.net>

reassign 387498 linux-2.6,libc6

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:02:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I am able to reproduce this bug, but on mipsel only. I am using a 2.6.17
> 64-bit kernel. 

I have made some more tests, I am actually able to reproduce it on both
mips and mipsel, but only on 2.6 kernels (32- or 64-bit), ot on 2.4
kernels. 

My guess is that the bug is in the kernel.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Processed: linux-2.6 FTBFS on hppa is still there
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?
Previous by thread: Processed: linux-2.6 FTBFS on hppa is still there
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread