Bug#387808: marked as done (initramfs-tools: scripts/nfs doesn't properly handle when server-ip is included in root-path)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <E1GPgsL-0005UI-3Q@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#387808: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.80
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.79
Severity: normal
one more bugfix to the nfs handling. :)
it's a trivial fix, but when the dhcp server passes the server-ip as
part of root-path, it's not correctly handled in scripts/nfs. patch
attached which fixes this.
live well,
vagrant
=== modified file 'scripts/nfs'
--- scripts/nfs
+++ scripts/nfs
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
NFSOPTS="-o ${NFSROOT#*,}"
fi
NFSROOT=${NFSROOT%%,*}
- if [ "${NFSROOT#*:}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
+ if [ "${NFSROOT#:*}" = "$NFSROOT" ]; then
NFSROOT=${ROOTSERVER}:${NFSROOT}
fi
fi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: initramfs-tools
Source-Version: 0.80
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
initramfs-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
initramfs-tools_0.80.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.80.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.80.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.80.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.80_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.80_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 387808@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> (supplier of updated initramfs-tools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:56:47 +0200
Source: initramfs-tools
Binary: initramfs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.80
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>
Description:
initramfs-tools - tools for generating an initramfs
Closes: 387808 387809 387841 387909
Changes:
initramfs-tools (0.80) unstable; urgency=high
.
Release "O partigiano, portami via, che mi sento di morir."
.
* update-initramfs: Test for lilo executable earlier otherwise an warning
would be issued with grub installed and left over lilo config.
.
* hook-functions: Add lasi700 to the scsi modules. (closes: 387909) Thanks
Nagilum <nagilum@nagilum.org>. Thus urgency high.
.
* scripts/nfs: Fix typo in ipconfig protocol handling, fix dhcp server
passing ser-ip as part of root-path, retry every second to not hammer
an FAI'ed nfs initramfs network. Thanks for input and patches
Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant+bugs@freegeek.org>. While we are there refactor
the loop. (closes: 387841, 387808, 387809)
.
* update-initramfs: Check if /proc is mounted for ro_boot_check.
Files:
592233da42384cb4efebb6f9f6bdf088 623 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.80.dsc
86b0d2f4b36f6ffdebd81d2b0d57446b 50245 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.80.tar.gz
b48e40fe1e51328dd4b40097f6e6939a 56158 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.80_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFEAEy6n7So0GVSSARAkZmAJ9qBmwsmFRa2HYpRubkZ7pIhHljRACfWDbr
7OBrpE5vmws0mb9KPopI0RI=
=zq3e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: