[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#325070: marked as done (XFS - invalid module format)



Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:12:13 -0600
with message-id <20060905141212.GO17946@colo>
and subject line Debian #325070: XFS - invalid module format
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-mckinley
Severity: important
Version: 2.6.12-5

The xfs module fails to load with an error about invalid module format.
modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting xfs (/lib/modules...): Invalid module
format

The only thing in dmesg that looks interesting is: 
xfs: value -69175290139775312 out of IMM22 range

Cheers,
-Thom


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.17-4

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:18:40AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi Dann,
> 
> does the state of #325070 ("upstream") mean that it is fixed in Debian
> but pending a fix upstream? Do we handle this generally this way (bug
> still open) or can the bug just be closed?

It means that its an upstream bug that is not fixed in Debian.
But, since then I have "fixed it" by dropping support for non-SMP
flavors, so I'm closing this bug.

-- 
dann frazier


--- End Message ---

Reply to: