[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#350333: marked as done (raw1394 does not work on i386)



Your message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:01:15 +0200
with message-id <20060904140115.cb235d58.dr@jones.dk>
and subject line Debian bug #350333: raw1394 does not work on i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
package: linux-2.6
version: 2.6.15-3
severity: important

Hi,

raw1394 does not work with 2.6.15-3 on a Thinkpad R51, while it works with 
2.6.12-1.

The command to reproduce is "dvgrab --size 0 -v foo" (grab from a camera) 
which is followed by "Error: no camera exists"


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpftKgHYHQqC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:59:15 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote:

> On Monday 04 September 2006 11:39, [Roland Stigge] wrote:
> > can #350333 be closed now?
> 
> I'd said so, but I cannot confirm, as I dont have a raw1394 device
> atm.

Yeah, let's do that: Bugreporter seems to suspect the problem has gone,
and my added worries was from an ancient time with a different ramfs
generator used as default by the official Debian kernels.

Bigreport closed.


 - Jonas


-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm

Attachment: pgpw2dTFKD4t5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: