Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>, Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:52:50 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060829205250.GA14508@kroah.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0608291341060.30381@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
References: <1156802900.3465.30.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0608290844240.30381@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz> <[🔎] 20060829183208.GA11468@kroah.com> <[🔎] 200608292104.24645.mb@bu3sch.de> <[🔎] 20060829201314.GA28680@aepfle.de> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0608291341060.30381@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:42:56PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> 
> besides, several kernel versions ago this used to work. the current 
> requirement is a regression as far as the user is concerned.

Then go bug the driver authors please :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread