[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383486: marked as done (DAC960 module not loaded following install)



Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:54:49 -0300
with message-id <87u04b715y.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br>
and subject line Closed in previous upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation
Version: Etch Beta 3

Following installation of Etch, using the Beta 3 installer (netinst CD image), installation runs to completion without error, on reboot, grub appears fine, and the kernel loads, but during boot hangs with something like "waiting for root filesystem". The root partition is on a Mylex DAC960PRL RAID controller, and there is no sign of the relevant module being loaded during boot.

PCI vendor ID for the device is: 0x1069
PCI device ID for the device is: 0x0010

I presume the problem lies in the initramfs, but I can't easily get into the system to dig around further...

grub boot options are:

kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16-2-686  root=/dev/rd!c0d0p2 ro
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.16-2-686



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.65

This bug was close in Martin's last upload. Closing it.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

--- End Message ---

Reply to: