Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>>>> think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release team
>>> I had such a plan, but no time to implement it currently.
>> How do you handle the fact that it is a license violation making the
>> thing illegal to distribute?
> I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
> true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for
> me to ignore the opinion of the debian-legal@ armchair lawyers.
Could they have signed license agreements that we (not being
executives of RHAT and Novell) don't know about?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE1ANpS9HxQb37XmcRAmswAKDF5zCi6C4FIzDfGHvz2RPj2OgfaACbBwj8
A1nxGf1PgNvdXV1bwL090zM=
=5gfY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: