[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#228211: marked as done (kernel-build-... should provide kernel-headers-...)



Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:03:19 +0200
with message-id <20060731170319.GB14671@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line old 2.4 kernel bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: module-assistant
Version: 0.5
Severity: normal

It appears that module-assistant doesn't cope terribly well with the way
the kernel is packaged for PowerPC machines.  The program appears to
insist on having a package kernel-headers-$(uname -r) installed but the
only format in which the source is avaliable as a package is a
kernel-patch-$VER-powerpc package.

I'm not entirely sure what the way forward here is or if this is even a
problem for module-assistant to address - a large part of the reason I'm
trying to use module-assistant is that I don't really follow how one is
supposed to work with kernel module packages shipped as source.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux damiel 2.4.22-powerpc #1 Wed Jan 14 17:02:37 CET 2004 ppc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8

Versions of packages module-assistant depends on:
ii  perl                          5.8.2-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
dear bug subitters,

thanks for your bug report. Newest Debian unstable ships much newer
linux 2.6 kernels. So either your bug repot got solved or due to new
packageing is no longer relevant. therefor closing.
if you still experience the mentioned problem, don't hesitate to write
back and the report will be reopened.

you might want to test out the daily builds of the debian installer:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
the next beta 3 installer for Debian Etch is expected soon. :)

thanks for your feedback.

best regards

--
maks

--- End Message ---

Reply to: