Re: Scheduling 2.6.16-16 (was: Re: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED)

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Scheduling 2.6.16-16 (was: Re: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 09:59:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060708075946.GA13140@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060707181328.GA32337@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] E1Fyl3u-0000gq-Jt@spohr.debian.org> <[🔎] 20060707181328.GA32337@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

* Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> [2006-07-07 20:13]:
> linux-2.6* is not binNMU-able. This upload includes source changes.

This latter has nothing to do with the former at all.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

References:
- linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED
  - From: Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Scheduling 2.6.16-16 (was: Re: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED)
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#342248: should be fixed with new linux
Next by Date: Bug#341801: skge error; hangs w/ hardware memory hole
Previous by thread: Scheduling 2.6.16-16 (was: Re: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED)
Next by thread: Processing of linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread