Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17 > > or 2) create separate metapackages for linux-2.6 (linux-image-2.6-686-sid, > > for example). > > AFAIK the plan is the following: > - linux-2.6 remains the metapackages, the point to the last available > one. > - linux-2.6.16 contains no metapackages. > - linux-latest-2.6 or so contains the metapackages to match linux-2.6.16 > and have to go through t-p-u. As mentioned on #debian-boot, this is going to cause a lot of pain for d-i. Why not do it dannf's way? -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature