Re: linux-2.6 testing migration
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > > > Other issues:
> > > > > > * NEW
> > > > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the ftpmasters will fix this soon.
> > > > > Seems to be resolved now.
> > > > -15 will again hit NEW.
> > > And if there are failures again with -15, can we expect a -16 soon that
> > > fixes them *without* needing to add new packages?
>
> > No. We never say that we will not include new packages, only the
> > possibility is rather small. But we refuse to drop work just to
> > workaround somebody else problem (NEW handling).
>
> So if -15 is still broken I should plan to NMU rather than count on -16
> doing anything to address the needs of testing users in a timely manner?
Get the ftp-master to not delay NEW over-much, or get a NEW-excemption for the
kernel packages.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: