Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800
> LUK ShunTim <shuntim.luk@polyu.edu.hk> wrote:
>
>
>>>I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k.
>
>
> Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong
> interest in working in the open.
Hello Jonas,
As you said, there is no secret at all. :-)
>
> I understand if this can be confusing: Some get furious when you "make
> too much noise" in bugreports, others (like me) when you don't.
>
>
> Besides, I did not request those lengthy details - on the contrary I
> suggested this to be a non-bug.
Thanks for your opinion but that's something I, as an ordinary user and
reporter of (probable) bugs, not fully competent to judge.
>
> And if you were to play nice with lengthy details for bugreports you
> could either compress it or put it somewhere on the web and only refer
> to it with a URL.
I *have* thought about all these options and I've chosen this course
action which IMO is reasonable, under the current circumstances. And I'm
sure package maintainers would provide sufficient information to the bug
list after the investigation.
Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly) from
me on this topic. Thank you for your patience and
good day,
ST
--
Reply to: