[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#278729: kernel-image-2.6-k7: kernel-image-2.6*-k7* and 2.6*-686* should



On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0900, Horms  <horms@debian.org> said: 

> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:01:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0100, Sven Luther
>> <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> said:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:30:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:36AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:31:10 +0900
>> >> > > Horms <horms@debian.org> wrote:
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > > Waldi, can you coment on how to add a recommends to images
>> >> > > > on a per-flavour basis?
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > Isn't per-flavour control hints one of the new features of
>> >> > > the soon-to-be-in-sid kernel-package?
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > If so, I suggest using that instead of bloating linux-2.6
>> >> > > packaging unnecessarily.
>> >> > 
>> >> > linux-2.6 packaging already has quite nice per-flavour
>> >> > dependency handling, thank you.
>> 
>> Would it not be nice to push it down into the underlying tool, so
>> that even endusers get a nicely hinted per flavour images, as
>> appropriate? I mean, we cater to all users, not just those that use
>> official Debian kernels.

> Don't we need to handle the control file ourselves because we make
> multiple make-kpkg invocations which all come together to form a
> single source package?

        I am planning on constructing the control file from bits even
 in the default install so that the uml and xen images do not show up
 in the control file but are never built, and we get all the "package
 exists in control file but not in changes" warnings.  Perhaps there
 can be a set of mini-control files concatenated together into a
 control file before it is read by Make?

        manoj
-- 
Absurdity, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with
one's own opinion. Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Manoj Srivastava     <srivasta@acm.org>    <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: