Re: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:46:06 +0200
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Well, as my previous tries in communicating about these issues where
> mostly ignored, this may bring some visibility to it, that said as
> 2/3rd of the packages involved are d-k maintained anyway, and i am
> currently fixing them, this should be no big issue, i also don't
> think this should be a problem for Jonas.
Sorry for only beaming you brainwaves off-list, Sven, and not making
sure you could actually read my mind. In other words: I thought I'd
already responded (positively!) about this, but obviously not. :-)
Ok with me to tag this as RC.
All credit for the fine packaging of yaird is thanks to upstream, who
provided me with almost perfect packaging initially and taught me on
some packaging practices I wasn't aware of. Only nitpicking (and my odd
idea of the maintainer field being only for DDs) got my name into the
changelog.
That said, I also think I should be able to implement those options to
the mkinitrd.yaird wrapper - if upstream doesn't beat me to it ;-).
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDT441n7DbMsAkQLgRAvSYAJ9gCxHarI1Dwf0XaBVJP0P8cCeWpQCfe66U
Reu4WMqiwxGUl30rjJ4vHDc=
=KT+q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: