[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#245424: marked as done (kernel: Please create a kernel-headers package for 2.4)



Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:41:26 +0100
with message-id <20050110194126.GV2542@stro.at>
and subject line kernel: Please create a kernel-headers package for 2.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 04:28:22 +0000
>From jamesm@mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au Thu Apr 22 21:28:22 2004
Return-path: <jamesm@mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au>
Received: from mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au [128.250.54.157] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BGsIY-0004n6-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:28:22 -0700
Received: from jamesm by mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BGsIU-0002ZB-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:28:18 +1000
From: James McCaw <jamesm@mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel: Please create a kernel-headers package for 2.4
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:28:18 +1000
Message-Id: <E1BGsIU-0002ZB-00@mint.ph.unimelb.edu.au>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: kernel
Version: N/A; reported 2004-04-23
Severity: normal

Hi,

There is currently a kernel-image-2.4 package that depends on the latest
version of the kernel, and a kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4 package, but
there is no kernel-headers-2.4 package to allow the automatic upgrading
to the latest kernel-headers for that sub-architecture.

FYI, this was reported and fixed for the 2.6 series kernels in Debian bug
239280.

James

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245424-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 19:41:27 +0000
>From max@stro.at Mon Jan 10 11:41:27 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Co5Pq-00082f-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:41:26 -0800
Received: from sputnik (sputnik.itp.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.48.177])
	by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8615C001
	for <245424-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:41:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Co5Pq-0001R3-CX
	for 245424-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:41:26 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:41:26 +0100
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 245424-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel: Please create a kernel-headers package for 2.4
Message-ID: <20050110194126.GV2542@stro.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 245424-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Done for the next release.  Thanks.

--

sarge contains kernel-headers-2.4-foo, so i'm closing that bug report.
thanks maks



Reply to: