On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:18 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: [...] > > ia64-generic-no-smp.dpatch still needs a forward-port. > drivers-scsi-generic_proc_info.dpatch should be dropped, but we need to > make sure the kernelk-image packages depend on the latest initrd-tools > Alright, I'll look into that. > btw, any reason your newly commited patches have leading numbersi n > their patch names, unliked all the older patches? > To keep track of them outside of SVN. I'm working w/ arch people to track down some sort of resource leak that makes tla/baz explode when dealing w/ kernel source trees; until then, I'm forced to work w/out an RCS (svn isn't useful for my purposes; quilt may be, but the last time I tried it, I wasn't happy w/ it). So, the numerals are just used for keeping chronological order within my own 2.6.10+fixes_only tree, for now. There's no reason they can't be renamed in SVN; I just didn't have the desire to do so. -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part