(Please do not CC me; I'm subscribed to all lists relevant here) On Thursday 29 December 2005 16:34, Sven Luther wrote: > I would have thought it the other way around, there is no reason to use > initramfs-tools for a new install, since we are then not upgrading from > 2.4 kernels. That is not a reason _not_ to use it. > The other issues are just bugs which needs to be fixed. While they are there, IMO they make yaird the less obvious choice for D-I. > But really, my own feeling is that initramfs-tools is still in a less > mature state than yaird accross al architectures, not sure if this > really changed for 2.6.15 though. Can you give real arguments for that please? Also, note that yaird _has_ been made the default for all architectures where initramfs-tools is not installable or unusable.
Attachment:
pgp5hUUGJDxJX.pgp
Description: PGP signature