Bug#344205: linux-source-2.6.14: drivers/net/wireless/airo.c fails to compile
Package: linux-source-2.6.14
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: normal
Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
external patches), I get an error in drivers/net/wireless/airo.c. The
full .config + log file is about 4500 lines, so I'm not sure whether I
should attach them to this bug report. I uploaded them, they're
available (in the form of a script(1) transcript) at the following
URL: http://roland.mas.free.fr/tmp/make-kpkg.log
Short excerpt:
CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/airo_cs.o
CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/airo.o
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:93:2: warning: #warning MIC support requires Crypto API
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c: In function 'flashcard':
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:7495: warning: implicit declaration of function 'flashpchar'
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c: At top level:
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:7575: error: static declaration of 'flashpchar' follows non-static declaration
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:7495: error: previous implicit declaration of 'flashpchar' was here
make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/airo.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
The .config file has been obtained by the following steps: starting
from a .config that worked under 2.6.12, copy to the new source
directory, make menuconfig, exit without changing anything, save
changes anyway.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.14 depends on:
ii binutils 2.16.1cvs20051214-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii bzip2 1.0.2-11 high-quality block-sorting file co
Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.14 recommends:
ii gcc 4:4.0.2-2 The GNU C compiler
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 The GNU version of the "make" util
-- no debconf information
Reply to: