Bug#343583: marked as done (kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of sync for Sparc)
Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:36:10 -0800
with message-id <20051216123608.GB26006@tennyson.dodds.net>
and subject line Bug#343583: kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of sync for Sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2005 11:25:09 +0000
>From m.hotze@wanadoo.nl Fri Dec 16 03:25:09 2005
Return-path: <m.hotze@wanadoo.nl>
Received: from smtp-1.wanadoo.nl ([193.252.22.241])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnDi1-0000Cq-8Q
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:25:09 -0800
Received: from wwinf6003 (wwinf6003 [172.22.155.30])
by mwinf6009.wanadoo.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5F0767000089
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:24:38 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: 20051216112438389.5F0767000089@mwinf6009.wanadoo.nl
Message-ID: <[🔎] 11708452.1134732278379.JavaMail.www@wwinf6003>
From: "M. Hotze" <m.hotze@wanadoo.nl>
Reply-To: m.hotze@wanadoo.nl
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of
sync for Sparc
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [83.83.82.114]
X-WUM-FROM: |~|
X-WUM-TO: |~|
X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~|
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:24:38 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-10sarge1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Hello,
When attempting to make some small modifications to the Sparc kernel, in general, one runs into problems making it, because the version of the available source code does not match the available image version.
Installed image and source via dselect:
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64_2.4.27-9sarge1_sparc.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge1_all.deb
I could not find matching pairs of them using in ftp.debian.org either.
Challanged though, I've first made a kernel image using the config-2.4.27 file which was placed in /boot (during install of Sarge, it's now put there, which is ok!). I compiled like explained in http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/ch08s04.html.en. After dpkg -i, It showed my kernel and the original kernel differed. I found out the config files of the source (in /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.27/arch/sparc64) and image (in /boot) differed. Apart from that, I think the source code itself is different too, at least the version numbers differ...
I did not succeed running this kernel by the way, because system halted after rebooting (Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:01), but that's a problem to be posted somewhere else.
Solution for the image/source version difference would be to synchronize the two. It's an easy fix, and I think a lot of users would benefit from.
Thanks!
Maarten
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 343583-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2005 12:36:15 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Fri Dec 16 04:36:15 2005
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnEop-0000L9-BY
for 343583-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:36:15 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3D5D87002; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:36:10 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: m.hotze@wanadoo.nl, 343583-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#343583: kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of sync for Sparc
Message-ID: <20051216123608.GB26006@tennyson.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 11708452.1134732278379.JavaMail.www@wwinf6003>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 11708452.1134732278379.JavaMail.www@wwinf6003>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:24:38PM +0100, M. Hotze wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-10sarge1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> Hello,
> When attempting to make some small modifications to the Sparc kernel, in
> general, one runs into problems making it, because the version of the
> available source code does not match the available image version.=20
> Installed image and source via dselect:=20
> kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64_2.4.27-9sarge1_sparc.deb
> kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge1_all.deb
Which are built from separate source packages; there is no reason you should
expect the version numbers should match. Instead, please check the
Build-Depends of the kernel-image packages (apt-cache showsrc
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64) to see which version of the kernel-source
package it corresponds to.
The rest of your concerns appear to be issues for debian-user or
debian-kernel, and not bugs in the packages TTBOMK.
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDorS4KN6ufymYLloRAoOgAJ98IJvYLiZs34SMQLCGgFg5tmf1NACgpfO+
DSbpbQ8XP7R1EEB9IyaDbUY=
=3vnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi--
Reply to: