Bug#341871: marked as done (linux-2.6 2.6.14-4 pool timestamps a year off)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:41:12 -0600 (CST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512040136080.32575@europa.tliquest.net>
and subject line Bug#341871: linux-2.6 2.6.14-4 pool timestamps a year off
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 19:18:05 +0000
>From ryan@tliquest.net Sat Dec 03 11:18:05 2005
Return-path: <ryan@tliquest.net>
Received: from mail.cyberonic.com ([4.17.179.4])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EictY-0005dG-S9
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:18:05 -0800
Received: from europa.tliquest.net (node-40241c9a.mdw.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.28.154])
by mail.cyberonic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id jB3JYDKN032144
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:34:14 -0500
Received: (qmail 20406 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2005 19:18:03 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 3 Dec 2005 19:18:03 -0000
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:18:03 -0600 (CST)
From: Ryan Thoryk <ryan@tliquest.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: linux-2.6 2.6.14-4 pool timestamps a year off
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0512031312360.19263@europa.tliquest.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: important
While manually getting the debian-patches package, I noticed that all of
the 2.6.14-4 packages have timestamps a year off (11/26/04 - should be
11/26/05), while the 2.6.12-10 packages are fine (09/27/05). I don't know
if this would cause any problems (unless there's date verification of the
files), but someone's clock is off by a year ;)
Ryan Thoryk
Unix and Network Specialist
ryan@tliquest.net
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341871-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 07:41:14 +0000
>From ryan@tliquest.net Sat Dec 03 23:41:14 2005
Return-path: <ryan@tliquest.net>
Received: from mail.cyberonic.com ([4.17.179.4])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EioUj-0003Q4-Qt
for 341871-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:41:14 -0800
Received: from europa.tliquest.net (node-40241c9a.mdw.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.28.154])
by mail.cyberonic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id jB47vWKN029543
for <341871-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 02:57:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 1567 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2005 07:41:12 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 4 Dec 2005 07:41:12 -0000
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:41:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Ryan Thoryk <ryan@tliquest.net>
To: Frederik Schueler <fs@lowpingbastards.de>
cc: 341871-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#341871: linux-2.6 2.6.14-4 pool timestamps a year off
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20051204000435.GG31890@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512040136080.32575@europa.tliquest.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0512031312360.19263@europa.tliquest.net>
<[🔎] 20051204000435.GG31890@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Just looked over the files, and it's just the other mirror I'm getting
the files from and nothing else (so everything's fine then). I'll close
the bug.
Ryan Thoryk
Unix and Network Specialist
ryan@tliquest.net
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:18:03PM -0600, Ryan Thoryk wrote:
>> While manually getting the debian-patches package, I noticed that all of
>> the 2.6.14-4 packages have timestamps a year off (11/26/04 - should be
>> 11/26/05), while the 2.6.12-10 packages are fine (09/27/05).
>
> Which timestamps are wrong: The files in tha package, or the
> packages files itself?
>
> Where did you get the files from? Looks like your mirror's clock is wrong.
> If the files IN the packages have wrong timestamps: Which packages
> exactly? at least for amd64 and i386 this is not reproducible.
>
> Best regards
> Frederik Schueler
>
> --
> ENOSIG
>
Reply to: