Re: version/infrastructure separation test ...
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> Yes and no. The problem is that basically we have two different things, the
> first one is the build infrastructure, which should really not be all that
> different for each version, and which there is really no need to have a branch
> per version from.
>
> On the other hand, the per version configs and patches cannot be done without,
> and thus should be hold in a different branch each.
>
> This indeed adds some complexity (rather minimal though if done right), but on
> the other hand it will keep the branching to the absolute minimum, and weren't
> you the one complaining about too many branches ?
Yes, though it doesn't decrease the number of branches, the number
of non-infastructure branches remains the same, and additionally,
we have a (sometimes branched) set of infastruture somewhere else.
--
Horms
Reply to: