Re: Care to comment on plan for module building?
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:08:30 +0100, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> said:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:29:52PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Eduard (and cc kernel list),
>>
>> I have put together a draft for future kernel module handling,
>> based on a discussion at the kernel list and spiced up with a few
>> thoughts of my own. It is available here:
>> http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging
>>
>> Could you please have a look and tell me what you think (or perhaps
>> simply edit that wiki page directly)?
> Notice that you again sided with Manoj, depite him never providing
> any arguments in favour of not using the standard upstream mandated
> build symlink,
his is a mnischaracterization of my position, but then, I have
come to expect that.
The upstream convention of using
/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build
is supported, has been supported, and shall be supported by
kernel-package in the future.
> and since both of you prefered resulting to insults instead of
> reasoned argumentations, i want to have no plan with any such plans
> as you have, so go ahead, and break everything for all i care.
Packages built using kernel-package coherently are not
broken. Just more FUD and slander.
manoj
--
"Some would sooner die than think. In fact, they often do." Bertrand
Russell
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: