Re: Bug#336600: Processed: I guess yaird should resolve failures early?

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Cc: srivasta@golden-gryphon.com, srivasta@debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#336600: Processed: I guess yaird should resolve failures early?
From: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:04:12 -0700
Message-id: <1130796252.1673.16.camel@krebs.dannf>
In-reply-to: <20051031204857.745726a2.dr@jones.dk>
References: <87u0exwpau.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <handler.s.C.11307814647143.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <20051031204857.745726a2.dr@jones.dk>

(replacing bug addr w/ debian-kernel, for a more general discussion)

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:48 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> For 2) see draft at http://wiki.debian.org/FlexibleKernelHandling

This sounds like a very good approach to me, fwiw.

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#336600: Processed: I guess yaird should resolve failures early?
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>

Prev by Date: Processed: misc control changes
Next by Date: I2O v dpt_i2o & #328534
Previous by thread: Bug#336600: Processed: I guess yaird should resolve failures early?
Next by thread: Bug#336688: yaird: ide module piix not included in initrd image -> machine does not boot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread