Bug#335230: More Code also Random, but less :-)
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Marco Amadori wrote:
> But you missed to clear us if mdadm and vgchange are needed to evms to shows
> up in case of compatibility volumes, but I think so anyway so I produced this
> random code:
I actually do not think so. I'm unsure for LVM2, but for the MD volumes, the
device node /dev/evms/ has exactly the same major and minor as the one in
/dev.
Note that /dev/evms/lvm2/ can AFAIK contain EVMS volumes, it's just the LVM
that isn't managed directly by EVMS.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: