Bug#258043: marked as done (kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7: doesn't list which patches are incorporated: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7, kernel-image-2.6.7: doesn't list which patches are incorporated)
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:12:08 +0900
with message-id <20051031061208.GG26678@verge.net.au>
and subject line fixed in 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 (experimental), 2.6.14-rc1 (sid)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 10:29:51 +0000
>From kk@kk.verfaction.de Wed Jul 07 03:29:51 2004
Return-path: <kk@kk.verfaction.de>
Received: from nyx.verfaction.de [212.9.161.72] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bi9gV-00063f-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 03:29:51 -0700
Received: from erebos.verfaction.de
([3ffe:400:d00:7357::1] helo=erebos.kk.de ident=Debian-exim)
by nyx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.32)
id 1Bi9gU-0006uD-0y
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:29:50 +0200
Received: from ganymede.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::10])
by erebos.kk.de with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.32)
id 1Bi9gM-0004cE-0G; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:29:45 +0200
Received: from kk by ganymede.verfaction.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bi9gO-0001bA-O4; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:29:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:29:44 +0200
Message-Id: <E1Bi9gO-0001bA-O4@ganymede.verfaction.de>
Sender: Kilian <kk@kk.verfaction.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7: doesn't list which patches are incorporated:
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7,
kernel-image-2.6.7: doesn't list which patches are incorporated
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@kk.verfaction.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7: doesn't list which patches are incorporated
Severity: normal
The description from kernel-patch-debian and kernel-image does not
list which patches are contained in the Debian diff. That way it's
pretty hard to evaluate which benefits are already provided by using the
debian kernel package compared to going vanilla (and patching in what
you need apart from vanilla).
Moreover i think it'd make more sense making kernel-patch-debian a
meta-pacakge depending on all diffs it contains. That way reverting one
patch out of the Debian proposed patchset will be much easier.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-vs1.9.1.10
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 258043-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2005 06:13:10 +0000
>From horms@koto.vergenet.net Sun Oct 30 22:13:10 2005
Return-path: <horms@koto.vergenet.net>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWSuq-0007g5-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:13:08 -0800
Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100)
id 2C45F34029; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:12:35 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:12:08 +0900
From: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
To: 258043-close@bugs.debian.org, 309909-close@bug.debian.org,
330916-close@bugs.debian.org, 333003-close@bug.debian.org,
333842-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 (experimental), 2.6.14-rc1 (sid)
Message-ID: <20051031061208.GG26678@verge.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Cluestick: sevenverge.net.au
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: 258043-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
found 333842 2.6.14-rc1
thanks
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
This is a manually generated message to close bugs
closed in 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 now
that 2.6.14-rc1 is in unstable.
If you believe a bug is still present in 2.6.14-rc1, please reopen it.
This does nto close 333842 as it manifests in a different form in
2.6.14-1. A fix is in SVN and shuold appear in 2.6.14-1
--
Horms
Reply to: