[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#325026: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Oops on DHCP request for Broadcom 4401 ethernet controller)



Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510222216290.5484@bobcat>
and subject line No further details, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2005 16:36:14 +0000
>From edi@hotmail.de Thu Aug 25 09:36:14 2005
Return-path: <edi@hotmail.de>
Received: from i5100.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.162.98] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E8Ki6-0005qy-00; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:36:14 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (i5100.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.162.98])
	by i5100.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19FB30082;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:35:48 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "E.S. at TUD" <edi@hotmail.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Oops on DHCP request for Broadcom 4401 ethernet
 controller
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:35:03 +0200
Message-Id: <20050825163548.F19FB30082@i5100.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important


When requesting a new IP-Address with dhclient kernel 2.6.12 oopses!!!

I have a Broadcom 4401 Ethernet Controller which probably uses the b44
kernel module.

Here is the error message i'm getting (for kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
everyting works fine):

bash$ dhclient eth0

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e12f0350
  printing eip:
  *pde = 1fdc8067
  *pte = 00000000
  Oops: 0000 [#1]
  Modules linke in: radeon drm parport_pc lp parport binfmt_misc
  ipt_state ip_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables mousedev joydev
  eth1394 ide_cd cdrom rtc ohci1394 ieee1394 snd_intel8x0m snd+intel8x0
  snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd
  soundcore snd_page_alloc tpm_nsc tpm_atmel tpm pci_hotplug autfs4
  af_packet pcspkr intel_agp agpgart hw_random sg scsi_mod tsdev evdev
  pcmcia thermal processor fan button battery ac ohci_hcd ehci_hcd
  uhci_hcd usbcore b44 mii yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pcmcia_core
  nls_cp437 ntfs dm_mod psmouse ext3 jbd mbcache resierfs ide_disk
  ide_generic via82cxxx trm 290 triflex slc90e66 sis5513 siimage
  serverworks sc1200 rz1000 piix pdc202xx)old opti621 ns87415 hpt366
  hpt34x generic cy82c693 cs5530 cs 5520 cmd64x atiixp amd74xx alim15x3
  aec62xx pdc202xx_new ide_core unix fbcon tileblit font bitblit vesafb
  cfbcopyare cfbimgblt cfbfillrect softcursor ccapability commoncap
  CPU: 0
  EIP: 0060:[<e12f0350>] Tainted: PF    VLI
  EFLAGS: 00010286   (2.6.12-1-686)
  EIP is at 0xe12f0350
  eas: ...
  esi: ...
  ds: ...
  Process ifconfig (pid: 6880, threadinfo=....
  Stack: ....

  Call Trace:
       dev_seq_printf_stats+0x1d/0xf0
       dev_seq_show+0x1c/0x40
       seq_read
       vfs_read
       sys_read
       syscall_call
  Code: Bad EIP value.


				
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils                     5.2.1-2    The GNU file management utilities 
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.82     tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325026-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 05:17:55 +0000
>From jurij@wooyd.org Sat Oct 22 22:17:55 2005
Return-path: <jurij@wooyd.org>
Received: from mouth.voxel.net (mail.squishy.cc) [69.9.180.118] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ETYF1-0000Dv-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:17:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.squishy.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EAA4C34051
	for <325026-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
Reply-To: jurij@wooyd.org
To: 325026-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: No further details, closing
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510222216290.5484@bobcat>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Delivered-To: 325026-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

I'm closing this bug after two weeks of inactivity, as planned.
Feel free to reopen at any time with new information.

Best regards,

Jurij Smakov                                        jurij@wooyd.org
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/                   KeyID: C99E03CC



Reply to: