Bug#313637: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-686: Why no 2.6.11?)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:13 -0600
with message-id <1127882533.8546.32.camel@localhost>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 18:46:29 +0000
>From jdorje@users.sf.net Tue Jun 14 11:46:29 2005
Return-path: <jdorje@users.sf.net>
Received: from cpe-065-184-169-022.ec.res.rr.com (localhost.localdomain) [65.184.169.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiGQf-0005VR-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:46:29 -0700
Received: from jdorje by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1DiGQe-0005vM-Gr; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:46:28 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dorje Short <jdorje@users.sf.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6-686: Why no 2.6.11?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:46:28 -0400
Message-Id: <E1DiGQe-0005vM-Gr@localhost.localdomain>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-image-2.6-686
Version: 101
Severity: normal
Is there a reason why this package doesn't depend on kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686? I couldn't find anything too serious in the bug list for that package, nor an entry for the reason in the bug list for this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 2.6.8-16 Linux kernel image for version 2.6
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 313637-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 04:42:47 +0000
>From dannf@dannf.org Tue Sep 27 21:42:47 2005
Return-path: <dannf@dannf.org>
Received: from colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKTmJ-0007eE-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:42:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601E229802F
for <313637-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:48:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from colo.lackof.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (colo.lackof.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 02474-10 for <313637-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:48:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58C9298026
for <313637-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:48:49 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: fixed
From: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
To: 313637-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:13 -0600
Message-Id: <1127882533.8546.32.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lackof.org
Delivered-To: 313637-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1:2.6.12-3
This is fixed in 1:2.6.12-3, which now provides this metapackage.
However, this is just a transitional package - please use
linux-image-2.6-686 instead.
--
dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
Reply to: