[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#329671: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the intel x86 port is appears to be compiled in 64bit mode.)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200
with message-id <20050922210704.GA8141@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Bug#329671: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the intel x86 port is appears to be compiled in 64bit mode.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 15:52:27 +0000
>From gmpc@sanger.ac.uk Thu Sep 22 08:52:27 2005
Return-path: <gmpc@sanger.ac.uk>
Received: from smtp.sanger.ac.uk [193.62.203.215] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EITN5-0004Wh-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:52:27 -0700
Received: from mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk ([172.17.60.2] ident=Debian-exim)
	by intmail1a.internal.sanger.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1EITMZ-0006M8-Ke
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:55 +0100
Received: from gmpc by mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EITM7-0001Yg-8h
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guy Coates <gmpc@sanger.ac.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the intel x86 port is appears
 to be compiled in 64bit mode.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:51:27 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1EITM7-0001Yg-8h@mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 103
Severity: important


I've installed Sarge x86 on a opteron system. When changing the
kernel from 

kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp 
to
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp 

the machine architecture as reported by uname changes:

When running  kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp

uname -m 
i686

On kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp
uname -m 
x86_64


Concequently, many applications fail to build correctly
from source (eg the linux kernel, probably anything using
config.guess) as the architecture is incorrectly specified.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp depends on:
ii  kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k 2.6.8-14   Linux kernel image for version 2.6

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329671-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 21:07:07 +0000
>From waldi@debian.org Thu Sep 22 14:07:07 2005
Return-path: <waldi@debian.org>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIYHb-0002kv-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:07:07 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A2C413C017; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:07:04 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
To: Guy Coates <gmpc@sanger.ac.uk>, 329671-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#329671: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp: Kernel image in the intel x86 port is appears to be compiled in 64bit mode.
Message-ID: <20050922210704.GA8141@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] E1EITM7-0001Yg-8h@mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1EITM7-0001Yg-8h@mascotsrv.internal.sanger.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: 329671-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:51:27PM +0100, Guy Coates wrote:
> the machine architecture as reported by uname changes:

The uname shows the architecture of the kernel, not the userspace, so
this is the excepted behaviour by changing from a 32bit to a 64bit
kernel.

Bastian

--=20
Is truth not truth for all?
		-- Natira, "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched
		   the Sky", stardate 5476.4.

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkMzHPgACgkQnw66O/MvCNFMZACgoWC/t3TiY3iUTZvt7uegSGS0
6+8An3bbHXLUa+WuL1cG6+RZTNUUSiIb
=sPv0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--



Reply to: