Bug#322734: patch?
tags 322734 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:33:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:40:55PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Horms wrote:
> >
> > >I just took a quick glance, and that patch does seem
> > >to be in Linus's Git Tree, and possibly a release.
> > >I'll poke further, but thats probably reason enough
> > >to put it into the Debian kernels. Well, that and
> > >it solving your problem.
> > >
> > >Jurij, any objections, this is pretty much your corner of the feild?
> >
> > As it appears to do the right thing, it is fine with me. I'll push it
> > into svn tomorrow, if you'll not beat me to it :-). I've just asked
> > Clint to test what happens without the sungem module, since he previously
> > reported oopses in different places when sungem driver is not loaded. That
> > will determine whether this report may be closed completely or we'll need
> > to keep it open until we figure what's going on with other oopses.
>
> This seems to be part of 2.6.13.2, which I am currently applying
> to 2.6.12. So I'll include it with that commit.
>
> I'll also add it to 2.6.13, and see if it is relevant for
> 2.4.27 and 2.6.8. But probably not until a bit later.
It is in SVN now, tagged BTS accordingly.
--
Horms
Reply to: