Re: Bug#326004: reopen the bug
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:30:33PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
>
> dann frazier writes...
>
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:19 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I'm thinging that if the use of the BTS is really to allow
> > > users to track all problems in a package, its probably
> > > useful to have a separate, but linked BTS, that allows
> > > the maintainers to track what they are actually working on.
> >
> > Have you looked at user tags for that? I haven't yet, but Matt Taggart
> > has been using something like that for a while now to track lsb issues.
>
> That thing I had been using for a last couple years was an LSB
> specific hacked cgi script that AJ provided. It has been replaced by
> the new generic user tags stuff that AJ announced on d-d-a recently.
> It should do exactly what you want. I recommend setting up a general
> namespace for "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" that various people
> edit and also each developer could have their own which maybe the wiki
> could have pointers to. Then people would have an easy way to see the
> different views of the world.
That sounds like an excellent idea. We already make some use
of the wiki to note policy about patches, the status of
updates, and stuff like that. So that seems like a good place to put
this.
Perhaps kernel-team, or dkt, as a space for the team,
then suffix details after that. I'm not sure that we need
per-user stuff for members of the team, but that could easily be added.
Is something like this appropriate
dkt-unimplemented
dkt-work-in-progress-upstram
dkt-work-in-progress
dkt-backport-is-too-damn-hard-update-to-newer-version
...
--
Horms
Reply to: