Re: Bug#328130: RM: please remove any remnant of 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels from etch/sid
- To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com>, Per Olofsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Bug#328130: RM: please remove any remnant of 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels from etch/sid
- From: Horms <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:55:14 +0900
- Message-id: <20050915035512.GA5624@verge.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com>, Per Olofsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <20050915025026.GB1646@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
- References: <20050913180111.GA21271@localhost.localdomain> <20050914025403.GK1646@A-Eskwadraat.nl> <20050914072730.GX27828@verge.net.au> <20050914233546.GA1646@A-Eskwadraat.nl> <20050915021935.GF2012@verge.net.au> <20050915025026.GB1646@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:50:26AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > (...)
> > Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
> > than later
> I hope so too :)
> > With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386.
> > I notice that pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 exists and presumably works.
> > I've CCed the maintainer, Per Olofsson for comment.
> Ok, either way, since 2.4.27 exists, I won't let pcmcia-modules-2.4.26 block
> > > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64
> > >
> > > Ditto -- shouldn't this one be simply superseded by packages generated by a
> > > next upload of linux-2.6?
> > amd64 still doesn't seem to exist for linux-2.6, I'm not sure why,
> > perhaps I am just blind or looking in the wrong place
> > http://ftp2.jp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/
> > However, once it is uploaded, it will have binary packages with
> > the same names as those previously produced by the
> > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 source package. Does this mean that
> > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 will automatically be removed, or automatically
> > flagged for removal?
> Yes, if all binary packages of a give source package are 'hijacked' by another
> package, the source package will be automatically flagged for removal, and
> packages automatically flagged for removal will be removed by an ftp-team
> member every few days.
> So, no action needed, and not removing will ensure a smooth transition.
Thanks, I'll prepare a fresh list for you ASAP.