On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:46:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > They could be releases/sid/linux-nonfree-2.6 and > releases/sid/arch/mips/linux-patch-2.6.12-mips ? What do you want to do with the contents of utils? We currently differentiate between kernel themself, documentation and support utils. > > Depends on what you mean with "developed". We saw that it is not > > possible to get regular testbuilds of the repository version and I broke > > 3 uploads because of this. If we want to be able to regulary push > > working versions into testing, we can't just push unchecked changes into > > this tree. This means that the sid tree can't be the development tree. > Well, but we still need the sid tree fairly available to make bug fixes and > such, but yes, it definitively makes sense to have both a sid and an > experimental tree. Most of the changes can go to the development tree first and merged back from them. (Take a look at the subversion project, you'll get killed if you commit directly to a release branch if you do that without explicit approval.) > Maybe we could even do daily-builds out of the experimental > tree or something ? This will help. But we should begin to disable arches where we don't have a possitive result. arm currently don't have any developer machine for example. Bastian -- Deflector shields just came on, Captain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature