Re: kernel-image-2.6 meta-package
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Stromek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why every kernel-image-2.6 meta-package in testing is dependent on 2.6.8 and not on 2.6.11 kernel package.
We are in the process of fixing that, but taking a bit longer than
expected because of wanting to change them meta-pakcages source package,
and some version shenanigans.
> I have also found that there is no 2.6.11 kernel-source package in
> testing. Haven't been 2.6.11 fully accepted into testing yet? There is 2.6.11 in
> unstable.
2.6.11 is being debricated in favour of linux-source-2.6.12
--
Horms
Reply to: