[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#282741: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces)



Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200
with message-id <20050812092425.GJ30206@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 06:11:06 +0000
>From hasso@hasso.estpak.ee Tue Nov 23 22:11:06 2004
Return-path: <hasso@hasso.estpak.ee>
Received: from hasso.estpak.ee [194.126.115.44] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CWqMr-0007nd-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:11:05 -0800
Received: from hasso by hasso.estpak.ee with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CWqMn-0005Mi-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:11:01 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Hasso Tepper <hasso@linux.ee>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:11:01 +0200
Message-Id: <E1CWqMn-0005Mi-00@hasso.estpak.ee>
Sender: Hasso Tepper <hasso@hasso.estpak.ee>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-source-2.6.9
Version: 2.6.9-2
Severity: normal


Interfaces don't get IPv6 link-local addresses if IPv6 is compiled as
module and module is loaded after network interface driver module. For
more info and patch see
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00558.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=et_EE.iso8859-15, LC_CTYPE=et_EE.iso8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.9 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.15-4     The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                         1.0.2-1    A high-quality block-sorting file 
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282741-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 09:25:05 +0000
>From max@baikonur.stro.at Fri Aug 12 02:25:05 2005
Return-path: <max@baikonur.stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E3Vmj-0003YE-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:25:05 -0700
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 811F15C00F; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:25 +0200
From: Maximilian Attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 282741-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel-source-2.6.9: No link-local address on ethernet interfaces
Message-ID: <20050812092425.GJ30206@baikonur.stro.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 282741-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

ipv6 is no longer experimental in 2.6.12.
pretty sure your mentioned bug got fixed in between.
please reopen if pain subsists.

--
maks



Reply to: