On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an > > appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides? > > This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to > install the new package. Even with the appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides? -- Horms