On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote: > > > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable. > > I guess we need an epoch > Give the man an epoch! 2.6.12-2 is re-tagged in svn, w/ some epoch spiffiness that waldi did; only the transition packages (kernel-image-*) got epoch'd. We're both building test packages.. Hopefully this should appease katie. -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part