[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#313534: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: usbnet not working with Zaurus SL-C1000 on usb)



Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:24:58 +0200
with message-id <20050807122458.GO1807@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line kernel-image 2.6.11-5 not detecting Zaurus 5500
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 07:22:59 +0000
>From oberger@ouvaton.org Tue Jun 14 00:22:59 2005
Return-path: <oberger@ouvaton.org>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Di5lC-0004xp-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:22:58 -0700
Received: from shuttle (mag77-1-82-238-13-91.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.13.91])
	by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0438417348C;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:22:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from olivier by shuttle with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Di5lA-0003qC-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:22:56 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Berger <oberger@ouvaton.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: usbnet not working with Zaurus SL-C1000 on usb
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:22:55 +0200
Message-Id: <E1Di5lA-0003qC-00@shuttle>
Sender: Olivier Berger <oberger@ouvaton.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7
Version: 2.6.11-5
Severity: normal


I have plugged my SL-C1000 Zaurus for usb network connection.

The Zaurus gets detected (though through some little painful setup : adding proper USB setup in hotplug, but anyway that works).

# lsusb
Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04dd:9031 Sharp Corp. Zaurus C-750/C-760/C-860/SL-C3000 PDA

usbnet is loaded

# lsmod | grep usbnet
usbnet                 29128  0
usbcore               119352  7 usbnet,ehci_hcd,usbhid,ndiswrapper,usblp,uhci_hcd
mii                     5056  2 usbnet,8139too

But there is no usb0 interface appearing when ifconfig -a

nor did I get anything on dmesg or syslog about usbnet initialising :(

And :
# ifup usb0
SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
usb0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Failed to bring up usb0.

It seems there is something non-standard with the USB implementation on the Zaurus : I think this patch may be necessary in the kernel : http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg34891.html although I'm not sure if it applies to 2.6.11 or 2.6.12 ...

Maybe this will help solve bugs #311221 or #311222 although they may be linked to something else in prior stages (detecting the Zaurus connected to USB in hotplug, etc.) which I think I solved now.

Hope this helps.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils                     5.2.1-2    The GNU file management utilities 
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.81.1   tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 313534-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 12:25:38 +0000
>From max@baikonur.stro.at Sun Aug 07 05:25:38 2005
Return-path: <max@baikonur.stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E1kDh-0005Nc-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 05:25:37 -0700
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id F09835C010; Sun,  7 Aug 2005 14:24:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:24:58 +0200
From: Maximilian Attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 311222-done@bugs.debian.org, 311221-done@bugs.debian.org,
	313534-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel-image 2.6.11-5 not detecting Zaurus 5500
Message-ID: <20050807122458.GO1807@baikonur.stro.at>
References: <20050726155930.GP382@baikonur.stro.at> <[🔎] 20050807120826.GA1678@radix50.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050807120826.GA1678@radix50.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 313534-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:08:26PM +0200, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> Hello Maximilian,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:59:30PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > did you test the 2.6.12 linux image from unstable?
> 
> Took some time to understand that the new package was called
> linux-image.
> 
> I tried it, it works for me.
> 
> We could probably close #311221, #311222, and #313534.
> 
> With kind regards,
> Baurzhan.

thanks for your quick feedback and aboves bug pointers. :)
closing also those.
if your pain subsist with linux image 2.6.12 please reopen.

thanks
--
maks



Reply to: