linux-kernel-di udebs [Was: Re: 2.6.12 upload]
Bastian Blank <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> I tend to aggree, though I believe Franz Pop, or perhaps some of the
>> other d-i team members have reason for keeping these images separate.
>> Perhaps they could reiterate them here.
> Mostly two reasons:
> - Changes in the d-i packages don't trigger a complete rebuild.
> - There are more then 200 different binary packages.
At the start changes have been common and modules have been added or
removed or packages been split or joined.
But hasn't that settled down now? Aren't the linux-kernel-di udebs
consistent enough to be handled by kernel-source uploads?
I've CCed debian-boot to get a broader opinion.