Bug#241497: marked as done (need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:45 +0200
with message-id <20050531165745.GH30671@djpig.de>
and subject line CLosing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2004 09:21:16 +0000
>From pgd@shakti.ath.cx Sat Feb 07 01:21:16 2004
Return-path: <pgd@shakti.ath.cx>
Received: from h26n9c1o1018.bredband.skanova.com (localhost) [81.230.0.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ApOeK-0002sF-00; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 01:21:16 -0800
Received: by shakti.ath.cx
via sendmail from stdin
id <m1ApOeH-0022dIC@localhost> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:21:13 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <m1ApOeH-0022dIC@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Karolina Lindqvist <pgd-karolinali@algonet.se>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: illegal instruction on a 386
Bcc:
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:21:12 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: breaks the whole system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
libc6 gives "illegal instruction" on execution of almost any program.
Libc6 uses the non-386 BSWAP instruction, which is non-existing on a 386.
The CPU tested on is a Nexgen, which has a 386 instruction set.
As an example:
Core was generated by `ls --color=auto -l core'.
Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
Reading symbols from /lib/librt.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/librt.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libacl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libacl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libattr.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libattr.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_compat.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_nis.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
#0 0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x400c91a9 in adjtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x400ca0a6 in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x400c8612 in localtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4 0x00000001 in ?? ()
#5 0x401690a0 in _obstack () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#7 0xbffff918 in ?? ()
#8 0x0804d47b in ?? ()
#9 0xbfffdc8c in ?? ()
#10 0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#11 0xbfffdf31 in ?? ()
(gdb) x/i 0x400ca38f
0x400ca38f <tzset+943>: bswap %eax
(gdb)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAJK4IMtlM9PL9yocRAgn/AJ9bg6C+8chBYtUPOLlu4SKZ1zPfLwCggL1V
XDOOeoku9ElnDoId0I0WfGU=
=iH8c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 241497-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2005 16:57:51 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Tue May 31 09:57:49 2005
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdA3p-00017c-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:57:49 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DdA3l-0001wI-Th
for 241497-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:46 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:57:45 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 241497-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: CLosing
Message-ID: <20050531165745.GH30671@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 241497-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
The backports are in place in the archive and the upgrade is documented
in the release notes. So I think we can finally close this bug.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: