Re: kernel updates accepted for sarge
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:36:58PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:45 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:57:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > > If there are updates to unstable pending for any other architectures, please
> > > > > > let debian-release know.
> > >
> > > > > I am preparing an upload of kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 version 2.6.8-14,
> > > > > wich contains all current security updates.
> > >
> > > > > I'll notice you again as soon as my sponsor has done the upload.
> > >
> > > > I've just completed a sponsored upload of Frederik's changes.
> > >
> > > I don't see any sign of this upload.
>
> > My bad - I didn't notice this error:
> > [ Uploading job kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-14_i386
> > kernel-headers-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8_2.6.8-14_i386.deb 217.9 kBdupload
> > fatal error: Can't upload
> > kernel-headers-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8_2.6.8-14_i386.deb: Illegal PORT
> > command.
> > at /usr/bin/dupload line 506
>
> > I ran it again, and it completed successfully this time.
>
> Ok.
>
> This part of the diff is not described in the changelog (it's not just a
> rebuild):
>
> --- /tmp/filefAHsZy/kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64-2.6.8/debian/rules Fri Jan 28 07:29:50 2005
> +++ /tmp/filecchChY/kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64-2.6.8/debian/rules Fri May 20 07:53:29 2005
> @@ -129,22 +129,7 @@
> cat install-$$i/debian/files >> debian/files; \
> rm -rf install-$$i; \
> done
> -ifeq ($(debarch),i386)
> -# Rebuild amd64 debs for i386
> - set -e; \
> - for DEB in *_amd64.deb; do \
> - DIR=`echo $$DEB | cut -d"_" -f1`; \
> - mkdir -p debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN; \
> - dpkg -x $$DEB debian/$$DIR/; \
> - dpkg -e $$DEB debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN/; \
> - sed 's/Architecture: amd64/Architecture: i386/' < debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN/control > debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN/control2; \
> - mv debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN/control2 debian/$$DIR/DEBIAN/control; \
> - dpkg-deb -b debian/$$DIR ..; \
> - rm $$DEB; \
> - done
> - sed -e 's/_amd64\.deb/_i386.deb/' debian/files > debian/files.tmp
> - mv debian/files.tmp debian/files
> -endif
> +
> mv *.deb ..
>
> binary: binary-indep binary-arch
>
> So, unpacking the package now to make sure this change isn't going to hurt
> anything...
Yeah, I noticed that too:
<dannf> fs: why did the ifeq ($(debarch),i386) block get to go away in this release?
<fs> dannf: a change in kernel-package
<dannf> fs: is that change in sarge?
<fs> dannf: yes, I compiled the package at least 10 times the last 2 weeks, on both sarge and sid
<fs> kernel-package is the same in sarge and sid
<fs> same version
<dannf> fs: ok, cool
--
dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
Reply to: