Re: RFC: New uniform packaging scheme
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:30:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:04:33PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > As you might know, we are planning a transition to the common kernel
> > source, which is expected to build all the kernel-related packages,
> > eliminating the problems with arches getting out of sync, etc.
>
> Are the problems with > 200 binary packages really fixed? If you want to
> "fix" the problems, you have to integrate the udeb build process which
> produces currently something about 300 binary packages.
We have to investigate, but this can now be added as a release goal for etch,
and fixed in time.
I also was wondering if a bigger granularity of the module .udebs would be
worthwhile, having one .udeb per actual module, and then this would be a worse
problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: