[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#304944: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: eth0 and eth1 are swapped)



Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 04:01:19 +0200
with message-id <20050507020119.GK26765@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#304944: kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: eth0 and eth1 are swapped
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 17:43:15 +0000
>From vincent@vinc17.org Sat Apr 16 10:43:15 2005
Return-path: <vincent@vinc17.org>
Received: from jlefevre.net1.nerim.net (ay.vinc17.org) [80.65.226.245] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DMrK7-0006l6-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:43:15 -0700
Received: from lefevre by ay.vinc17.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DMrK4-0000wC-L2; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:43:12 +0200
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:43:12 +0200
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: eth0 and eth1 are swapped
Message-ID: <20050416174312.GA3385@ay.vinc17.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9-vl-20050401i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc
Version: 2.6.11-1
Severity: important

I was wondering why the network didn't work...

With older kernels (e.g. 2.6.8), dmesg gives:

[...]
ieee1394: Initialized config rom entry `ip1394'
ohci1394: $Rev: 1223 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
ohci1394: fw-host0: Unexpected PCI resource length of 1000!
ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[40]  MMIO=[f5000000-f50007ff]  Max Packet=[2048]
sungem.c:v0.98 8/24/03 David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
divert: allocating divert_blk for eth0
eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:30:65:cc:59:74 
PHY ID: 4061e3, addr: 0
eth0: Found BCM5221 PHY
ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[003065fffecc5974]
ieee1394: got invalid ack 252 from node 65535 (tcode 0)
ip1394: $Rev: 1224 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
divert: not allocating divert_blk for non-ethernet device eth1
ip1394: eth1: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0)
hdc: ATAPI 46X DVD-ROM drive, 512kB Cache, (U)DMA
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
PHY ID: 4061e3, addr: 0
eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full-duplex.
eth0: Pause is disabled
[...]

With 2.6.11, dmesg gives:

[...]
ieee1394: Initialized config rom entry `ip1394'
ohci1394: $Rev: 1223 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
ohci1394: fw-host0: Unexpected PCI resource length of 1000!
ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[40]  MMIO=[f5000000-f50007ff]  Max Packet=[2048]
ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[003065fffecc5974]
ieee1394: got invalid ack 252 from node 65535 (tcode 0)
eth1394: $Rev: 1224 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
eth1394: eth0: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0)
sungem.c:v0.98 8/24/03 David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
eth1: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:30:65:cc:59:74 
PHY ID: 4061e3, addr: 0
eth1: Found BCM5221 PHY
[...]

The consequence is that the network doesn't work by default at boot
time with the 2.6.11 kernel.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc depends on:
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.77     tools to create initrd image for p
ii  mkvmlinuz                     13         create a kernel to boot a PowerPC 
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304944-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 02:02:30 +0000
>From max@stro.at Fri May 06 19:02:30 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUEeD-0003vT-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 19:02:30 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
	by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF98A5C00F
	for <304944-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat,  7 May 2005 04:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DUEd6-0006zA-6t
	for 304944-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 07 May 2005 04:01:20 +0200
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 04:01:19 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 304944-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#304944: kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: eth0 and eth1 are swapped
Message-ID: <20050507020119.GK26765@sputnik.stro.at>
References: <20050416174312.GA3385@ay.vinc17.org> <20050421214713.GB6072@sputnik.stro.at> <20050424160700.GA3291@ay.vinc17.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050424160700.GA3291@ay.vinc17.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 304944-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

> I was wondering why the network didn't work...

the kernel never guarantees ethX ordering.
there for closing.

thanks for your feedback.

--
maks



Reply to: